Thursday Program Evaluation | District One EMS Council

Thursday - November 7, 2024

Program Effectiveness

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The program met my expectations and learning needs.
The information was presented at an appropriate learning level for this stage in my career.
The program format was effective.
The program allowed me to increase my connections with peers.
I learned skills and concepts that will help me be more effective and strategic in my work.
The program provided me with new ideas and resources.
I would recommend this program to colleagues.

Program Effectiveness Comments

Program Learning Objectives

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

My participation in this training helped me to:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
Differentiate between the different epinephrine concentrations and uses for each.
Differentiate the level of spinal cord injury based on a patient’s motor function.
Describe the arrest lifecycle for EMS Clinicians.
Increased awareness of the Florida Baker Act statutes and rules surrounding the care of the behavioral health patients in the ED.
Identify disaster response considerations for medical responders.
Understand the anatomy of the chest and when it should be opened.
Understanding key applications of ultrasound use in Trauma.

Program Learning Objectives Comments

Program Logistics

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

Program Logistics Comments

Speaker: Peter Antevy, M.D.

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The presenter demonstrated substantive knowledge of the topic.
The presenter’s use of class time was effective.
The presenter has strong presentation and delivery style.
The presenter created an effective peer learning environment.

Comments: Peter Antevy, M.D.

Speaker: Dorea Fowler, RN, BSN, CRRN, CCM

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The presenter demonstrated substantive knowledge of the topic.
The presenter’s use of class time was effective.
The presenter has strong presentation and delivery style.
The presenter created an effective peer learning environment.

Comments: Dorea Fowler, RN, BSN, CRRN, CCM

Speaker: Carol Milliken, DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, CFTP, CEN, CCRN, CLSSBB

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The presenter demonstrated substantive knowledge of the topic.
The presenter’s use of class time was effective.
The presenter has strong presentation and delivery style.
The presenter created an effective peer learning environment.

Comments: Carol Milliken, DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, CFTP, CEN, CCRN, CLSSBB

Speaker: Benjamin N Abo, D.O., EMT-P, FAWM

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The presenter demonstrated substantive knowledge of the topic.
The presenter’s use of class time was effective.
The presenter has strong presentation and delivery style.
The presenter created an effective peer learning environment.

Comments: Benjamin N Abo, D.O., EMT-P, FAWM

Speaker: Steven J. Schwartz, M.D.

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The presenter demonstrated substantive knowledge of the topic.
The presenter’s use of class time was effective.
The presenter has strong presentation and delivery style.
The presenter created an effective peer learning environment.

Comments: Steven J. Schwartz, M.D.

Speaker: David Somers, M.D. M.S.

On a scale of 1-5, please rate the following:

	1-Strongly Disagree	2-Disagree	3-Neutral	4-Agree	5-Strongly Agree
The presenter demonstrated substantive knowledge of the topic.
The presenter’s use of class time was effective.
The presenter has strong presentation and delivery style.
The presenter created an effective peer learning environment.

Comments: David Somers, M.D. M.S.

Was the conference valuable?

What aspects of the training were most beneficial?

What aspects of the training did you find least valuable and what improvements would you recommend?

Give an example of one thing you will do differently because of this conference.